USPTO serial 86519674
POLO GEAR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DUBOIS, MICHELLE
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with POLO GEAR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Wellington, FL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Sheryl De Luca
Sheryl De Luca Nixon & Vanderhye P.C.901 N. Glebe Road, 11th FloorARLINGTON, VA 22203UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 014 | Bracelets; inexpensive non-jewelry watches; Jewelry; Jewellery; clocks and watches; Jewellery, clocks and watches; stop watches; sport watches; watch bands; Equestrian watches; cufflinks | ACTIVE | Dec 31, 1997 |
| 018 | Sport bags; athletic bags; carry bags for horse tack; harnesses; bits; bridles; briefcases; carry-all bags; clothing for animals; dog apparel; duffle bags; equine boots; equine leg wraps; exercise sheets for horses; fanny packs; garment bags for travel; girths; grooming organizers for travel; handbags; harness; horse bits; horse blankets; horse bridles; horse tack, namely, bridles, reins, leads, bits, breastplates, martingales, lunge lines, halters, saddle fittings, namely, stirrups, stirrup leathers and girth straps; horse wraps; key cases; knitted bags, not made of precious metals; leather briefcases; leather wallets; leather bags; leather credit card holder; luggage; muzzles; overnight bags; pet clothing, for dogs; purses; leather purses; riding saddles; saddle covers; saddles; tote bags; travel baggage; travel bags; umbrellas; wallets; whips | ACTIVE | Dec 31, 1993 |
| 025 | Athletic apparel, namely, shirts, pants, jackets, footwear, hats and caps; athletic uniforms; baby tops; baseball caps and hats; bathing suits; bathrobes; belts; berets; Bermuda shorts; blazers; board shorts; bomber jackets; boots; boxer shorts; breeches; business clothing, namely, jackets, trousers, blazers, button down shirts, camisoles; children's clothing, namely, shirts, pants, coats, dresses, shorts, sweatshirts, fleeces, namely, shirts, pants, jackets, hats and caps; clothing for athletic use, namely, shirts, sweatshirts, tee shirts, sweat pants, active wear, namely, shirts, shorts, pants, jackets made of performance fabrics that wick moisture; coats; crew neck sweaters; denim jackets; denims; dress pants; dress shirts; fleece bottoms; fleece pullovers; fleece tops; footwear; gloves; golf shirts; graphic T-shirts; T-shirts; horse riding boots; horse-riding pants; hosiery; jackets; jeans; knit shirts; leather jackets; socks; underwear; overcoats; pajamas; pique shirts; polo shirts; pullovers; rain jackets; riding boots; riding coats; riding gloves; rugby shirts; running suits; scarves; shirts; sweaters | ACTIVE | Dec 31, 1993 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 7, 2018 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 7, 2018 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 3, 2017 | LOPR | LETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE REVIEWED-NO FURTHER ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Jul 27, 2017 | LOPT | LETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED | — |
| Jun 29, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 29, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 29, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 1, 2017 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 12, 2016 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 31, 2016 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 31, 2016 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 31, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 3, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 3, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 25, 2016 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 25, 2016 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 22, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 17, 2016 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED | — |
| Feb 16, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 16, 2016 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 16, 2016 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 14, 2015 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 14, 2015 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 2, 2015 | WOAG | WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED | — |
| Nov 2, 2015 | WOAR | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED | — |
| May 8, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 8, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 8, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 5, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 10, 2015 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 9, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 3, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |