USPTO serial 86519769
VIKING BARRIERS ALL WEATHER DEFENSE SYSTEMS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- JUN, WON KYUNG WENDY
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with VIKING BARRIERS ALL WEATHER DEFENSE SYSTEMS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
League City, TX
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 019 | Synthetic roofing underlayment, synthetic house wrap, products for construction industry | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 9, 2016 | PRRD | PETITION RECONSIDERATION REQUEST DENIED | — |
| Apr 7, 2016 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Apr 6, 2016 | TPDR | TEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 6, 2016 | PRRR | PETITION RECONSIDERATION REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 22, 2016 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Feb 2, 2016 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Feb 2, 2016 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Dec 29, 2015 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 29, 2015 | ERCF | TEAS REQUEST TO CHANGE FILING DATE. | — |
| Dec 7, 2015 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 7, 2015 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 11, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 11, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 11, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 5, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 11, 2015 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 10, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 3, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |