USPTO serial 86520299
JULIEN ALEXANDRE CORRADO'S KITCHEN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PARADEWELAI, BENJI YUEN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with JULIEN ALEXANDRE CORRADO'S KITCHEN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Elizabeth Oliner
ELIZABETH OLINER Oliner Law345 Grove St Fl 2San Francisco, CA 94102-4462UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 008 | Apple corers; Can openers; Cheese planes; Cheese slicers; Compostable and biodegradable cutlery, namely, knives, spoons, forks; Cutlery, namely, knives, forks, spoons; Egg slicers; Flatware, namely, forks, knives, and spoons; Hand tools, namely, tongs; Hand-operated choppers; Kitchen knives; Knives; Knives, forks and spoons; Meat tenderizer, namely, a kitchen mallet; Meat tenderizer, namely, a pronged instrument for pounding meat; Non-electric fruit peelers; Non-electric vegetable peelers; Nutcrackers; Pizza cutters; Pizza slicers; Sugar scoops; Vegetable corers; Zesters; specifically excluding Ceramics; Pitchers; Urns; Basins, namely, bowls; Spice racks, Saucepan supports; and Funnels | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | Decorative magnets; Food safety monitoring devices, namely, thermometers; Meat thermometers; Thermometers not for medical purposes | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | Bakeware; Baking dishes; Baking mats; Basting brushes; Bottle openers; Bottle openers, electric and non-electric; Bowls; Brushes for basting meat; Cake decorating sets sold as a unit comprised primarily of decorating tubes, couplers and tips; Casseroles; Coffee scoops; Cooking graters; Cooking pans; Cooking pots; Cooking pots and pans; Cooking sieves and sifters; Cooking spoons; Cooking strainers; Cookware, namely, pots and pans; Cookware, namely, roasting pans; Cookware, namely, steamers; Cookware, namely, roasting pans, steamers, fry pans, sauce pans, sauciers, tapered pans for concentrating liquids, sautee pans, stock pots, casseroles, pasta cooking pots and colander inserts, braiser pans, roaster pans, stir fry pans, chef's pans, paella pans, omelette pans, au gratin pans, double boiler inserts and steamer inserts, and lids for all of the above; Cooling racks for baked goods; Corkscrews; Cutting boards; Cutting boards for the kitchen; Flour sifters; Holder for cutting board; Household utensils, namely, graters; Household utensils, namely, kitchen tongs; Household utensils, namely, sieves; Household utensils, namely, skimmers; Household utensils, namely, spatulas; Household utensils, namely, strainers; Household utensils, namely, turners; Ice cream scoops; Ice scoops; Kitchen utensils, namely, splatter screens; Paper baking cups; Pepper mills; Pizza peels; Pizza stones; Pot and pan scrapers; Potato ricers; Salt and pepper mills; Scoops; Scrapers for household purposes; Serving tongs; Silicone baking cups; Trivets; Whisks; Woks | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by MDC HOUSEWARES INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 008
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Similar marks named JULIEN ALEXANDRE CORRADO'S KITCHEN
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 15, 2017 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 12, 2017 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 20, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 20, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 20, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 1, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 1, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 31, 2016 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 19, 2016 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 19, 2016 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 19, 2016 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 18, 2016 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 9, 2016 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 9, 2016 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 9, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 8, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 8, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 8, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 3, 2016 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 2, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 2, 2016 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 2, 2016 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 4, 2015 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 4, 2015 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 5, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 5, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 5, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 29, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 10, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 3, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |