Drawing for K-ACE

USPTO serial 86521555

K-ACE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
PARKS, KIMBERLY L
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with K-ACE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kristi Caradonna

/KRISTI CARADONNA/6723 ODYSSEY DR NWHUNTSVILLE, AL 35806-3301UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001Fire extinguishing compositionsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 26, 2017MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 26, 2017ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 18, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 17, 2017EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jan 13, 2017AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Dec 2, 2016NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Dec 2, 2016TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Dec 2, 2016PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Dec 2, 2016PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Nov 25, 2016EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 24, 2016NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 29, 2016NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Mar 29, 2016PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 9, 2016NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Feb 23, 2016PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 17, 2016ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 16, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 5, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 5, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 4, 2016ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 27, 2016NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Jan 26, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 26, 2016PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jan 26, 2016PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Dec 9, 2015MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 9, 2015ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 13, 2015GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 13, 2015GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 13, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 7, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 11, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 5, 2015NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance