Drawing for FLASH

USPTO serial 86523486

FLASH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 605
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BAL, KAMAL SINGH
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FLASH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Roberto Ledesma

ROBERTO LEDESMA Law Office Of Roberto LedesmaPO Box 230692New York, NY 10023-0012UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025Clothing, namely, shoes, sport shoes, rugged outdoor shoes, golf shoes and bootsABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 25, 2016MAB5ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Apr 25, 2016ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Apr 19, 2016EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Feb 24, 2016ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Jan 26, 2016NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jan 26, 2016PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 6, 2016NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Dec 22, 2015PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 15, 2015CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 8, 2015XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Dec 8, 2015GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Dec 8, 2015GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Dec 8, 2015CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Nov 16, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 16, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 9, 2015ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 20, 2015ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Jul 7, 2015GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 7, 2015GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 7, 2015CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jul 7, 2015XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jul 7, 2015GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 7, 2015GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 7, 2015CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
May 14, 2015GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 14, 2015GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 14, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 7, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 12, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 6, 2015NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance