Drawing for OPERA

USPTO serial 86524220

OPERA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
PARKER, JUSTINE D
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with OPERA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Robert M. Wasnofski, Jr.

ROBERT M WASNOFSKI JR DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP51 WEST 52ND STREETNEW YORK, NY 10019-6119UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
014Watches and horological instruments and parts thereof; chronometric instruments, namely, chronographs for use as timepieces, chronometers; stop watches; component parts and accessories for timepieces, namely, straps for wristwatches, movements for watches and clocks, buckles for watch straps, watch crowns, cases for watches, watch springs, watch housings, faces for watches and clocks, dials for clock and watch making, hands for watches and clocks, watch glasses; clocks and parts therefor; caskets and cases for timepieces; boxes for timepieces; display cases for timepieces; timepiece cases in precious metal; cases for transporting timepiecesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 11, 2017MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Sep 6, 2017ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Sep 6, 2017EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jul 25, 2017EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
May 8, 2017GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
May 8, 2017GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
May 8, 2017CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Apr 12, 2017EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Apr 12, 2017JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Apr 7, 2017NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Apr 7, 2017PGTTPETITION GRANTED - TTAB APPEAL FILED—
Mar 30, 2017APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Mar 27, 2017EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Mar 23, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 23, 2017PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Mar 23, 2017ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 23, 2017REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Mar 23, 2017EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jan 23, 2017MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 21, 2017ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 20, 2016GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jun 20, 2016GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 20, 2016CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 19, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 18, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 18, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 18, 2015GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 18, 2015GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 18, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 26, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 26, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 17, 2015ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 28, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 31, 2015GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 31, 2015GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 31, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 30, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 11, 2015TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 13, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 7, 2015NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance