USPTO serial 86524332
CLEAN FOOD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 5066042Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 18, 2016
- Examiner
- SAPPENFIELD, ANN
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with CLEAN FOOD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Antoinette M. Tease
ANTOINETTE M. TEASE Antoinette M Tease P L L CPO Box 51016Billings, MT 59105-1016UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Classes in the field of culinary arts; conducting seminars and workshops in the field of health, nutrition and lifestyle wellness | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Nov 20, 2015 |
| 043 | Consulting services in the field of culinary arts | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Nov 20, 2015 |
| 044 | Counseling services in the fields of health, nutrition and lifestyle wellness; food nutrition consultation; providing a website featuring blogs in the field of health, nutrition and lifestyle wellness; conducting seminars and workshops in the field of health, nutrition and lifestyle wellness; conducting corporate wellness programs in the field of health, nutrition and lifestyle wellness | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Nov 20, 2015 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 28, 2023 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Oct 18, 2021 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 18, 2016 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Sep 14, 2016 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 1, 2016 | AAUA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 31, 2016 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 31, 2016 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 5, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 5, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 28, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 22, 2016 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 22, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 22, 2016 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 22, 2016 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 14, 2016 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 14, 2016 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 17, 2015 | GNR1 | NOTIFICATION OF DISAPPROVAL - AMENDMENT TO USE E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2015 | GNRU | DISAPPROVAL - AMENDMENT TO USE E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2015 | AAUD | AMENDMENT OF ALLEGED USE DISAPPROVED | — |
| Dec 17, 2015 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Dec 9, 2015 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 9, 2015 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 8, 2015 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 25, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 15, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 15, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 15, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 11, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 13, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 7, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |