USPTO serial 86524449
FRACLINE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SHINER, MARK W
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FRACLINE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Frances M. Jagla
FRANCES M. JAGLA Lane Powell Pc601 SW 2nd Ave Ste 2100Portland, OR 97204-3158UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Filter media, namely, carbon, chemicals for use in purifying water | ACTIVE | — |
| 019 | Sand, namely, pool filter sand, filtration sand, namely, processed silica sand and crushed quartz mixtures used in filters for potable water purification, waste water processing, industrial process fluids and recreation water filtration | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | Maintenance and repair services for sand processing plants; installation services for sand processing plants; sand washing | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by CDE Global Limited
- Other trademarks owned by CDE Global Limited
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Other trademarks in Class 019
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Similar marks named FRACLINE
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 16, 2017 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 16, 2017 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 24, 2017 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 24, 2017 | NOAC | CORRECTED NOA E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 23, 2017 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 23, 2017 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 16, 2017 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 6, 2017 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 6, 2017 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 6, 2017 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 6, 2017 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 16, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 14, 2016 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 14, 2016 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 14, 2016 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 15, 2016 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 19, 2016 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 19, 2016 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 30, 2015 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2015 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 10, 2015 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 10, 2015 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 10, 2015 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 10, 2015 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 10, 2015 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 23, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 23, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 13, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 23, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 15, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 15, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 15, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 11, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 18, 2015 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 17, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 7, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |