Drawing for NATURE'S CHOICE

USPTO serial 86525263

NATURE'S CHOICE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
VENGROFF, MARILYN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NATURE'S CHOICE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Dianne Smith-Misemer

DIANNE SMITH-MISEMER Hovey Williams LLP10801 Mastin Blvd., Ste 1000Overland Park, KS 66210-1697UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Nutritional supplements, probiotic supplements, dietary supplements, food supplements, vitamin and mineral supplements, protein powder supplements and protein powder drink mixes for making dietary and nutritional supplements for endurance sportsACTIVE—
029Nut butters, dried fruits, processed fruits, preserved fruits, nut meats, processed edible seeds, milk, almond milk for consumption as a beverage, edible oils and fats, wheat flakes, potato flakes, spelt flakes, dried beans and legumes, canned beans and legumes, processed spirulina; coconut milk being used as milk substituteACTIVE—
030Herbal teas, coffee, cocoa, mixes for making baking batters, bread mixes, pastas, food seasonings, spices, popcorn, sugar, processed wheat, couscous and rice; wheat flakes; spelt flakesACTIVE—
032Energy drinks, sports drinks, fruit drinks and fruit juices, non-alcoholic ciders, coconut milk not being a milk substitute, coconut juice, coconut water, soy-based beverages not being milk substitutes; almond milk for consumption as a beverageACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 5, 2018MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 5, 2018ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 7, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jul 5, 2017EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jul 5, 2017EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jul 5, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 7, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 5, 2017EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jan 5, 2017EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jan 5, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 23, 2016ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Jul 5, 2016NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 20, 2016ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED—
Jan 28, 2016ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Jan 5, 2016NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jan 5, 2016PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 16, 2015NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Nov 25, 2015ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Nov 24, 2015CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 14, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 13, 2015TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 13, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 13, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 18, 2015GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 18, 2015GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 18, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 12, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 18, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 9, 2015NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance