Drawing for THE JOINT

USPTO serial 86525425

THE JOINT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KHOURI, SANI PHILIPPE
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THE JOINT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jill M. Pietrini

JILL M PIETRINI SHEPPARD MULLIN RICHTER & HAMPTON LLP1901 AVENUE OF THE STARS STE 1600LOS ANGELES, CA 90067UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Entertainment services, namely, live musical performances, shows, and concerts; and nightclub servicesACTIVEMar 10, 1995

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 24, 2020ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jun 15, 2020MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jun 10, 2020ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jun 5, 2020ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jun 5, 2020EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jun 5, 2020CTDACT DECISION: AFFIRMED—
Jun 5, 2020CTDACT DECISION: AFFIRMED—
Jun 6, 2018ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Apr 4, 2018EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Aug 7, 2017RBFTREPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES—
Jul 10, 2017CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Jul 7, 2017CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
May 17, 2017JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Mar 13, 2017RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED—
Mar 13, 2017CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Jan 23, 2017EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jan 23, 2017JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jan 19, 2017EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jan 17, 2017MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 12, 2016CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 11, 2016CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 15, 2016ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jun 15, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 15, 2016MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 15, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 15, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 24, 2015ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Nov 24, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 23, 2015MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 18, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 18, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 12, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 4, 2015AMPXPRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED—
Feb 26, 2015ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 19, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 18, 2015PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Feb 9, 2015NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance