Drawing for SKYBULB

USPTO serial 86527898

SKYBULB

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MORENO, PAUL A
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SKYBULB?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Wes Schwie

Wes Schwie Schwie Law, LLC445 Minnesota StSuite 1500St. Paul, MN 55101

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Cameras; cameras specifically adapted to screw into a light socket; lighting systems comprising a camera and light emitting diodes, the lighting systems being specifically adapted to mount to a light socket; video surveillance systems comprising a light for use on a camera and a camera for transmitting images to remote locations; home automation systems comprising wireless and wired controllers, controlled devices, and software for lighting, home monitoring, security, and other home monitoring and control applications; motion detectors; electronic devices that wirelessly exchange data, namely, wireless transmitters and receivers; wireless communication devices for voice, data, or image transmissionACTIVE—
011LED (light emitting diode) lighting fixtures; light bulbsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 25, 2019ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Apr 1, 2019MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 1, 2019ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 14, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Aug 13, 2018EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Aug 13, 2018AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Aug 2, 2018EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Aug 2, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 10, 2018TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 17, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 15, 2018EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Feb 15, 2018EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Feb 15, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 15, 2017TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 15, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Aug 13, 2017EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Aug 13, 2017EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Aug 13, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 28, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 26, 2017EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jan 26, 2017EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jan 26, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 4, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 23, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jul 21, 2016EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jul 21, 2016EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jul 21, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 17, 2016ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 17, 2016REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Mar 1, 2016NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 5, 2016NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jan 5, 2016PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 16, 2015NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Oct 30, 2015CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 27, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 26, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 26, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 25, 2015ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 25, 2015REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Oct 13, 2015GAUNNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - E-MAILED—
Oct 13, 2015GAUDNOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - E-MAILED—
Oct 13, 2015NAUDREPORT UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - COMPLETED—
Oct 13, 2015ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Oct 13, 2015CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 10, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 10, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 10, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 19, 2015GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 19, 2015GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 19, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 13, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 24, 2015MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
Feb 23, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 11, 2015NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance