Drawing for UPREACH

USPTO serial 86528428

UPREACH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BROWN, BARBARA TROFFKIN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with UPREACH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Janet Fries

JANET FRIES Drinker Biddle1500 K St NW Ste 1000Washington, DC 20005-1207UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Consulting services, namely, consulting related to the planning and conducting of presentations for economic or advertising purposes relating to marketing and promotional activitiesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 20, 2018MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 20, 2018ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 20, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 18, 2018EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jan 18, 2018EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jan 18, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 20, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 19, 2017EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Sep 14, 2017AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Aug 21, 2017NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Aug 21, 2017TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Aug 21, 2017PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Aug 21, 2017PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Aug 21, 2017ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 19, 2017EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jan 19, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 17, 2017EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jan 17, 2017EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jan 17, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 5, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jul 2, 2016EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jul 1, 2016AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
May 31, 2016EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 31, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 31, 2016CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
May 31, 2016COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Jan 19, 2016NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 24, 2015NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Nov 24, 2015PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 4, 2015NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Sep 8, 2015PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Aug 25, 2015PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 17, 2015CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 10, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 10, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 31, 2015ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 28, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 18, 2015GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 18, 2015GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 18, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 14, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 24, 2015MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
Feb 23, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 12, 2015NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance