Drawing for ARKAIR

USPTO serial 86528783

ARKAIR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KUNG, KAELIE ELIZABETH
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ARKAIR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Carrie Webb Olson

CARRIE WEBB OLSON DAY PITNEY1 INTERNATIONAL PL FL 16BOSTON, MA 02110-3179UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
018Bags, namely, textile, canvas and leather shopping bags, athletic bags, drawstring bags, kit bags, leather and imitation leather bags, duffle bags, overnight bags, wheeled bags; satchels; sport bags; shoulder bags; holdallsACTIVE—
025Clothing, namely, jumpsuits, turtleneck shirts, T-shirts, vests, blouses, jeans, anoraks, leggings, gloves, swimming trunks, bathing costumes, sleepwear, outerclothing, namely, hooded sweatshirts, sportswear, namely, raincoats, hooded sweatshirts, and athletic pants, weatherproof clothing, namely, hooded sweatshirts, blazers, denims, jerseys, sweatshirts, pullovers, tops, hooded tops, headbands; footwear; headgear, namely, berets, woolly hats, bobble hatsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 30, 2018MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 30, 2018ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 18, 2018ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Dec 26, 2017NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 31, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Oct 31, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 11, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Sep 26, 2017PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 26, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 26, 2017XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Sep 26, 2017GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 26, 2017GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 26, 2017CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Sep 14, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 14, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 14, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 14, 2017DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Sep 7, 2017IROARESPONSE TO ITU OFFICE ACTION ENTERED—
Sep 7, 2017PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Aug 25, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 24, 2017NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Aug 23, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 23, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 23, 2017PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Aug 23, 2017PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Aug 23, 2017AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Aug 18, 2017MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 18, 2017ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 17, 2017INCDITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR DIVISIONAL REQUEST—
Jul 28, 2017AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jul 19, 2017DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Jul 19, 2017ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Jan 20, 2017GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 20, 2017GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 20, 2017CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Jan 18, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 17, 2017RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jul 14, 2016GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 14, 2016GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 14, 2016CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jul 7, 2016RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jun 30, 2016ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 18, 2015RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Dec 18, 2015ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 5, 2015CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
May 29, 2015ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 22, 2015EWAFTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS—
May 15, 2015GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 15, 2015GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 15, 2015CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
May 14, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 23, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 12, 2015NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance