Drawing for CASTLEBRANCH FUTUREFOCUS

USPTO serial 86530515

CASTLEBRANCH FUTUREFOCUS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BRADLEY, EVELYN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CASTLEBRANCH FUTUREFOCUS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Angela P. Doughty

ANGELA P. DOUGHTY WARD AND SMITH, P.A.751 Corporate Center Drive, Suite 300Post Office Box 33009Raleigh, NC 27636-3009

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Design and conducting of business, student, alumni and employee surveys for educational institutions for business purposes, namely, for improving and developing programs, reporting and credentialing requirements, research, alumni tracking, employment statistics, grant applications and requirements, and improving student and faculty satisfactionACTIVE—
041Design and conducting of surveys in the field of educational research, experience, training, and performance for educational institutions for the purpose of evaluating, improving and developing educational programs, namely, teaching proceduresACTIVE—
042Providing a website for the collection and analysis of business, student, alumni and employee personal and professional data for use by educational institutions for business purposes, namely, for improving and developing programs, reporting and credentialing requirements, research, alumni tracking, employment statistics, grant applications and requirements, and improving student and faculty satisfactionACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 8, 2020MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 8, 2020ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 9, 2019EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Oct 8, 2019EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Oct 8, 2019AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Oct 3, 2019EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Oct 3, 2019EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 12, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 5, 2019EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Apr 3, 2019EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Apr 3, 2019EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Apr 3, 2019EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 18, 2018TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 27, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 25, 2018EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Sep 25, 2018EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Sep 25, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 13, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 9, 2018EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Mar 9, 2018EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Mar 9, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 16, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 14, 2017EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Sep 14, 2017EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Sep 14, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 4, 2017NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 16, 2017CHPBPOST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT - ENTERED—
Feb 3, 2017APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Dec 27, 2016ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED—
Dec 27, 2016EPPATEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Jul 6, 2016ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Jun 14, 2016NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jun 14, 2016PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 25, 2016NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
May 7, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 4, 2016XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
May 4, 2016GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
May 4, 2016GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
May 4, 2016CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Apr 9, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 8, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 8, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 9, 2015GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 9, 2015GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 9, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 17, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 16, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 16, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 20, 2015GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 20, 2015GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 20, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 15, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 26, 2015MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
Feb 25, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 13, 2015NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance