Drawing for THE SCHWARTZ CENTER NATIONAL COMPASSIONATE CAREGIVER OF THE YEAR AWARD

USPTO serial 86531101

THE SCHWARTZ CENTER NATIONAL COMPASSIONATE CAREGIVER OF THE YEAR AWARD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
EULIN, INGRID C
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THE SCHWARTZ CENTER NATIONAL COMPASSIONATE CAREGIVER OF THE YEAR AWARD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Susan Neuberger Weller

SUSAN NEUBERGER WELLER Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky and Popeo P C701 Pennsylvania Ave NW Ste 900Washington, DC 20004-2608UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016Newsletters, informational flyers, brochures, and printed award certificates in the field of patient careACTIVE—
020Plaques made of woodACTIVE—
041Entertainment services, namely, organizing and conducting events in the nature of award ceremonies to demonstrate excellence in the fields of health care and patient careACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 11, 2016MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 11, 2016ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 8, 2015NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 14, 2015NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jul 14, 2015PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 24, 2015NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jun 5, 2015PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 3, 2015CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 3, 2015XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
May 29, 2015ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 29, 2015GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
May 29, 2015GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
May 29, 2015CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
May 19, 2015GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 19, 2015GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 19, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 19, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 26, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 14, 2015NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance