Drawing for JUJU ROYAL

USPTO serial 86532274

JUJU ROYAL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
STRUCK, ROBERT J
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with JUJU ROYAL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Shreya Biswas Ley

Shreya Biswas Ley LAYROOTS LLC7511 GREENWOOD AVE N UNIT 4114SEATTLE, WA 98103UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
034smokeless marijuana or cannabis vaporizer apparatus, namely, oral vaporizers for smokers; vaporizing marijuana or cannabis delivery device, namely, oral vaporizers for smoking purposesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 11, 2022TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 11, 2022ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 11, 2022REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
May 1, 2019ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Jun 19, 2017MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jun 6, 2017ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jun 6, 2017EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Nov 7, 2016EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Sep 23, 2016GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 23, 2016GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 23, 2016CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Jul 27, 2016JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jun 22, 2016GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jun 22, 2016GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jun 22, 2016CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Jun 4, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 4, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 2, 2016ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 24, 2016EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
May 24, 2016JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
May 24, 2016EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
May 23, 2016ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Nov 25, 2015GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Nov 25, 2015GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 25, 2015CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 2, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 2, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 2, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 9, 2015TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 7, 2015GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 7, 2015GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 7, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 29, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 10, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 4, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 27, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 14, 2015NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance