USPTO serial 86532794
THE BOX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TOOLEY, DAVID E
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with THE BOX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stephen D. Schrantz
STEPHEN D SCHRANTZ SCHRANTZ LAW FIRM PLLC1000 E MATTHEWS AVESUITE CJONESBORO, AR 72401-4344Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 004 | CHARCOAL; CHARCOAL PACKAGED IN CHARCOAL STARTER | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 18, 2017 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jul 18, 2017 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jul 14, 2017 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jul 14, 2017 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 22, 2017 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Feb 24, 2017 | RBFT | REPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES | — |
| Feb 3, 2017 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 3, 2017 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 3, 2017 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 8, 2016 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 11, 2016 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 11, 2016 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 11, 2016 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 16, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 16, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 5, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 29, 2016 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 29, 2016 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 29, 2016 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 29, 2016 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2016 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 29, 2016 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 11, 2016 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Dec 29, 2015 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Dec 15, 2015 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 20, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 19, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 19, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 24, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 24, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 24, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 19, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 27, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 16, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |