Drawing for STAY SHARP

USPTO serial 86535027

STAY SHARP

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
EINSTEIN, MATTHEW T
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with STAY SHARP?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lauri S. Thompson

LAURI S. THOMPSON GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP3773 HOWARD HUGHES PARKWAYSUITE 400NLAS VEGAS, NV 89169

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
008Hair cutting scissorsACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 17, 2017MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 17, 2017ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 29, 2016NOACCORRECTED NOA E-MAILED
Nov 28, 2016DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE
Nov 23, 2016AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL
Nov 1, 2016DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED
Nov 1, 2016ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED
Sep 17, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Sep 15, 2016EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Sep 15, 2016EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Sep 15, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 15, 2016NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 19, 2016NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Jan 19, 2016PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 30, 2015NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
Dec 17, 2015PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Dec 10, 2015CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Dec 9, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Dec 9, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 9, 2015ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Nov 24, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 20, 2015ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 20, 2015REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Oct 27, 2015TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
May 25, 2015GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 25, 2015GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 25, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 20, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Mar 2, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Feb 17, 2015NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance