USPTO serial 86538710
STRONG FOODS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KEELEY, ALISON REBECCA
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with STRONG FOODS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
William D. Wiese
William D. Wiese DuBois, Bryant & Campbell, LLP303 ColoradoSuite 2300Austin, TX 78701Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | cookbooks, printed guides and reference cards featuring information about the nutritional content of foods and beverages; books, printed guides and brochures about nutrition, menu planning, recipes, fitness, health and lifestyle; calendars; cookbooks, printed guides and brochures featuring topics relating to weight loss, weight control, weight maintenance, nutrition, menu planning, recipes, fitness, diet and nutrition information for the prevention of coronary diseases | ACTIVE | — |
| 029 | Prepared entrees, side dishes and meals consisting primarily of vegetables together with rice, other grains or pasta, and/or sauce; prepared dinners consisting of meat substitutes; vegetable based organic ready to eat food bars; processed vegetable based ready to eat food bars; processed fruit based ready to eat food bars; fruit based organic ready to eat food bars; jams, jellies, and fruit spreads; snack mix consisting primarily of processed fruits, processed nuts and/or raisins; food package combinations consisting primarily of processed fruit and/or vegetables; frozen vegetables; canned vegetables; frozen fruits; canned fruits; non-carbonated, vegetable based food beverages; peanut butter, butter substitutes, fruit toppings, nut toppings, processed nuts, tofu, tempeh, veggie burger patties | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Salad dressings, salsa, sauces, pasta sauce, tomato sauce, pesto, ready-made sauces, seasonings, spices; whole grain-based, ready to eat food bars and whole grain-based, ready to eat snack foods; ready to eat, cereal derived food bars; granola based snack bars; oatmeal; whole grain breads, whole grain pastas, whole grain breakfast cereals, breakfast cereals, processed cereals, whole grain muffin mixes, and whole grain pancake mixes; noodles and sauce mixes combined in unitary packages; noodles, sauce, and processed vegetables combined in unitary packages; noodles, sauce, and seasoning toppings combined in unitary packages; noodles, sauce, and topping combined in unitary packages; noodles, sauce, dehydrated vegetables, and topping combined in unitary packages; veggie burger sandwiches | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Conducting seminars, lectures and workshops in the fields of nutrition, plant-based diets, fitness and healthy eating habits | ACTIVE | — |
| 044 | Providing health eating planning, treatment and supervision through nutritional programs featuring counseling, creating diet regimes including plant-based diets, and discussions in the nature of consulting services in the field of nutrition | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Engine 2 For Life LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Engine 2 For Life LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 044
- Similar marks named STRONG FOODS
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 5, 2020 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 5, 2020 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 3, 2020 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 7, 2020 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 7, 2020 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 18, 2019 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 5, 2019 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 5, 2019 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 5, 2018 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 5, 2018 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 5, 2017 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 5, 2017 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 2, 2016 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 2, 2016 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 2, 2016 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 2, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 12, 2016 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 12, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 11, 2016 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| May 11, 2016 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 26, 2016 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 26, 2016 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 25, 2016 | WOAG | WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED | — |
| Apr 25, 2016 | WOAR | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 12, 2015 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 12, 2015 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 12, 2015 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 5, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 4, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 4, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 4, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 4, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 4, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 29, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 5, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 21, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |