Drawing for GREENSTONE

USPTO serial 86539437

GREENSTONE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KAJUBI, ELIZABETH N
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GREENSTONE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Thomas H. Zellerbach, Kristin S. Cornuelle

THOMAS H. ZELLERBACH, KRISTIN S. CORNUELLE Orrick Herrington & Sutcliffe Llp2050 Main St Ste 1100Irvine, CA 92614-8280UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Electronic devices, namely, wireless routers, wireless network extenders; wireless radio extenders, namely, peripheral devices for establishing wireless data connections between a plurality of computers and mobile devices, including establishing connection with smartphones, tablets, laptops, wearable devices and smart objects, permitting wireless transmission of data between these devices, including text messages, photos, voice, videos, audio files, digital music, electronic transactions, peer-to-peer payments, and permitting transmission of data between software and permitting application downloads, purchases, file transfers and the display of advertising formats, creating local peer to-peer networks and enabling shared access to the Internet through the connections available on these devices, including cable and wireless, and extending the range of access points to the Internet and wireless networksACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 10, 2017CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Aug 10, 2017COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Nov 7, 2016MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 7, 2016ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 5, 2016NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 9, 2016NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Feb 9, 2016PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 20, 2016NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jan 5, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 4, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 3, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 3, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 3, 2015GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 3, 2015GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 3, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 27, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 6, 2015MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
Mar 5, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 23, 2015NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance