Drawing for DOMINATOR

USPTO serial 86539456

DOMINATOR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BODRI, JOHN PETER
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DOMINATOR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Grady M. Garrison

GRADY M. GARRISON Baker Donelson Bearman & Caldwell165 Madison Ave Ste 2000Memphis, TN 38103-2799UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009protective eyewear, namely, goggles and spectacles; welding goggles; visitor's protective spectacles; eyeglass cases; and lenses for protective eyewear for industrial useACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 22, 2019ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Apr 14, 2016MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Apr 14, 2016ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Apr 13, 2016EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Nov 20, 2015GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Nov 20, 2015GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 20, 2015CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 30, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 29, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 29, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 29, 2015GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 29, 2015GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 29, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 28, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 6, 2015MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
Mar 5, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 23, 2015NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance