USPTO serial 86542777
HITBOX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PHILLIPS, WENDELL SHARMAN
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with HITBOX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Los Angeles, CA
Los Angeles, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David D'Zurilla
DAVID D'ZURILLA SCHWEGMAN LUNDBERG & WOESSNER PAPO BOX 2938MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-0938UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Business consulting services in the fields of digital marketing and marketing strategy, social media campaigns, media roadmaps and strategies, and audience behavior and trends; Production of advertising materials, namely, creating, designing, producing, and managing commercially produced videos in the nature of advertisements and promotional videos; Business management for others of live video game competitions, trade show events, and product launches | ABANDONED | Jan 12, 2015 |
| 041 | Video game production, namely, producing interactive media content in the nature of video games; Video production, namely, creating and producing internet streaming videos and commercially produced videos in the nature of videos produced for hire | ABANDONED | Jul 31, 2015 |
| 042 | Computer services, namely, design and development of interactive media content in the nature of computer game software; Designing live events, namely, design of sets and props for production of live video game competitions, trade show events, and product launches | ABANDONED | Jul 31, 2015 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 19, 2016 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jul 19, 2016 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jul 19, 2016 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 19, 2016 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 6, 2016 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 6, 2016 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 8, 2015 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 8, 2015 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 18, 2015 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 3, 2015 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 30, 2015 | AAUA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 29, 2015 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 29, 2015 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 29, 2015 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 29, 2015 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 29, 2015 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 29, 2015 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 14, 2015 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 14, 2015 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 13, 2015 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 5, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 5, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 25, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 10, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 5, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 5, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 5, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 30, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 10, 2015 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 9, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 26, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |