Drawing for LAROK

USPTO serial 86543572

LAROK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LOVELACE, JAMES B
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LAROK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jane Shay Wald,

JANE SHAY WALD, Irell & Manella1800 Avenue Of The Stars Ste 900Los Angeles, CA 90067-4276UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009SunglassesACTIVE—
018Handbags, wallets, tote bags, and back packsACTIVE—
021Household accessories and home items, namely, bottle openers, corkscrews, wine buckets, coolers for wine, glass stoppers; wine glasses; dinnerware, beverage ware, soap and lotion dispensers, soap dish, non-electric drinking tumblers, tooth brush holders, waste basket, pitchers and napkin rings not of precious metalACTIVE—
024Household accessories and Household accessories and home items, namely, towels, shower curtains, pillowcases, bed sheets, bed blankets, lap blankets, bedspreads, pillow shams, and draperiesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 2, 2018MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 2, 2018ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 28, 2017NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 3, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 13, 2017NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 25, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 24, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 23, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 23, 2017ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Feb 24, 2017CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 23, 2017CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 25, 2017RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jul 14, 2016RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jun 23, 2016ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 7, 2015CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Dec 7, 2015CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Dec 3, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 1, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 30, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 30, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 26, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 29, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 29, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 29, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 10, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance