CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for KRAVIS CENTER

USPTO serial 86545071

KRAVIS CENTER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
PEREZ, STEVEN M
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with KRAVIS CENTER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Leslie C. Adams

LESLIE C. ADAMS Haile Shaw & Pfaffenberger660 US Highway 1 Fl 3North Palm Beach, FL 33408-4628UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Pre-recorded DVDs featuring performances of a wide range of works of the performing arts, including opera, ballet, theater, dance and musicACTIVE—
016PostersACTIVE—
025Bottoms; Hats; Shirts; TopsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 23, 2018MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 23, 2018ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 23, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 21, 2017EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Sep 21, 2017EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Sep 21, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 16, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 14, 2017EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Mar 14, 2017EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Mar 14, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 24, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 22, 2016EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Sep 22, 2016EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Sep 22, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 22, 2016NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 26, 2016NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jan 26, 2016PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 6, 2016NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Dec 19, 2015CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 5, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 4, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 4, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 4, 2015GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 4, 2015GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 4, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 2, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 11, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 28, 2015NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance