Drawing for REIMAGINE THE RAN

USPTO serial 86545158

REIMAGINE THE RAN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RICHARDS, SUSAN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with REIMAGINE THE RAN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michael Y. Saji

Michael Y. Saji Parallel Wireless, Inc.100 Innovative Way, Suite 3410Nashua, NH 03062UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
038Communication services, namely, transmission of voice, audio, visual images and data by telecommunications networks, wireless communication networks, the Internet, information services networks and data networks; Mobile radio telephone services; Telecommunication services, namely, transmission of voice, data and documents, in the field of search and rescue operations and fire fighting operations; Telecommunications services, namely, wireless telephony and wireless broadband communications services for the transmission of voice and data; Wireless broadband communication servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 6, 2017CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Mar 6, 2017COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Mar 6, 2017TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 14, 2016MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 14, 2016ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 12, 2016NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 16, 2016NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Feb 16, 2016PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 27, 2016NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jan 9, 2016PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 6, 2016ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 6, 2016REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Dec 30, 2015CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 12, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 12, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 8, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 9, 2015CEPECOMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION ENTERED—
Jun 9, 2015ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 9, 2015GEANNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED—
Jun 9, 2015GEAPEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED—
Jun 9, 2015CPEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED—
Jun 2, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 11, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 28, 2015NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance