USPTO serial 86545423
VIRTUAL GUARD INC INTELLIGENT GUARDING SOLUTIONS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FOSDICK, GEOFFREY A
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with VIRTUAL GUARD INC INTELLIGENT GUARDING SOLUTIONS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Emily S. Levin,
EMILY S. LEVIN, Sbl Counsel1990 S Bundy Dr Ste 390Los Angeles, CA 90025-5268UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | Providing access to security video recordings in the fields of warehouses, office buildings, residential buildings, commercial buildings, warehouse building sites, office building sites, residential building sites, commercial building sites, land-based oil rigs, construction sites, demolition sites, bridges, security checkpoints, weigh stations, electrical substations, water treatment centers, waste treatment centers, dams, airports, parking lots, hydroelectric facilities, live entertainment events, live sporting events, live festivals, pipelines, railroad crossings, land-based vehicle roadways, ports-of-entry, border crossings via a global computer network | ACTIVE | Sep 9, 2009 |
| 045 | Security services, namely, providing mobile, on-site electronic surveillance services for security purposes with interactive video monitoring and recording by means of video cameras in the fields of warehouses, office buildings, residential buildings, commercial buildings, warehouse building sites, office building sites, residential building sites, commercial building sites, land-based oil rigs, construction sites, demolition sites, bridges, security checkpoints, weigh stations, electrical substations, water treatment centers, waste treatment centers, dams, airports, parking lots, hydroelectric facilities, live entertainment events, live sporting events, live festivals, pipelines, railroad crossings, land-based vehicle roadways, ports-of-entry, and border crossings | ACTIVE | Sep 9, 2009 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 4, 2016 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 4, 2016 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 4, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 4, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 4, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 2, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 12, 2015 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 11, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 28, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |