Drawing for BSO BEAUTY SUPPLY OUTLET

USPTO serial 86545723

BSO BEAUTY SUPPLY OUTLET

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BELENKER, ESTHER
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BSO BEAUTY SUPPLY OUTLET?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Scott Sullivan

SCOTT SULLIVAN REGIS CORPORATION7201 METRO BOULEVARDMINNEAPOLIS, MN 55439UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Retail store services featuring hair, nail, and beauty products; Franchise services, namely, offering business management assistance in the establishment and operation of hair salons and of retail stores featuring hair, nail, and beauty productsACTIVE—
044Hair salon servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 13, 2017MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 13, 2017ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 4, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Aug 2, 2016EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Aug 2, 2016EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Aug 2, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 9, 2016NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 15, 2015NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Dec 15, 2015PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 25, 2015NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Nov 6, 2015PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 29, 2015ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 23, 2015CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 21, 2015XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Sep 21, 2015GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 21, 2015GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 21, 2015CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Sep 19, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 18, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 18, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 3, 2015GEANNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED—
Jun 3, 2015GEAPEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED—
Jun 3, 2015EPENCOMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION AUTOMATIC ENTRY—
Jun 3, 2015CPEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED—
Jun 2, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 11, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance