Drawing for Serial No. 86546961

USPTO serial 86546961

Serial No. 86546961

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
NADELMAN, ANDREA KOYNER
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with Serial No. 86546961?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Paul E. Smithers

PAUL E. SMITHERS Bst Nanocarbon16275 Technology DrSan Diego, CA 92127-1815UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
018Backpacks, book bags, sports bags, bum bags, wallets and handbags; Bags and holdalls for sports clothing; Bags for sportsACTIVE—
025Sport shirts; Sports caps and hats; Sports jackets; Sports jerseys; Sports pants; Sports shirts; Sports shirts with short sleeves; Sports shoes; Sports vests; Tennis dresses; Tennis shoes; Tennis wearACTIVE—
028Paddles for use in paddle ball games; Platform tennis paddlesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 28, 2016MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 28, 2016ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 25, 2015NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 30, 2015NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jun 30, 2015PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 10, 2015NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
May 27, 2015PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 27, 2015ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 30, 2015CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 24, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 23, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 23, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 21, 2015GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Apr 21, 2015GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Apr 21, 2015CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Apr 16, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 13, 2015MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Mar 12, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 2, 2015NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance