USPTO serial 86547419
BIONYM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PERRY, KIMBERLY B
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BIONYM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Toronto, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joseph A. Sebolt
Joseph A. Sebolt Sand & Sebolt4940 Munson Street, NWAegis Tower, Suite 1100Canton, OH 44718Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Authentication and personal identification products, namely, computer software, sensors and portable and wearable electronic devices for use in identity authentication, identity management and providing remote access; system consisting of wearable digital electronic devices in the form of a wristband featuring software for use in the measurement of cardiac output and other physiological and cardiovascular parameters, assessing and validating the identity of an individual through the capture and recognition of the individual's electrocardiogram tracing, cardiac output and other physiological and cardiovascular parameters, and controlling access of an individual to electronic communication networks, electronic devices, namely, computers, mobile phones, tablets, laptops, building entry, computer networks and building and computer access control security systems by assessing and validating the identity of an individual through the capture and recognition of the individual's electrocardiogram tracing, cardiac output and other physiological and cardiovascular parameters; Computer hardware and associated software for use in the measurement of cardiac output and other physiological and cardiovascular parameters, assessing and validating the identity of an individual through the capture and recognition of the individual's electrocardiogram tracing, cardiac output and other physiological and cardiovascular parameters, and controlling access of an individual to electronic communication networks, electronic devices, namely, computers, mobile phones, tablets, laptops, building entry, computer networks and building and computer access control security systems by assessing and validating the identity of an individual through the capture and recognition of the individual's electrocardiogram tracing, cardiac output and other physiological and cardiovascular parameters; system consisting of apparatus, equipment and instruments for use in electrocardiogram diagnostics and/or measurement of cardiac output and other physiological and cardiovascular parameters, assessing and validating the identity of an individual through the capture and recognition of the individual's electrocardiogram tracing, cardiac output and/or other physiological and cardiovascular parameters, and/or controlling access of an individual to electronic communications, computerized systems, electronic devices, building entry, computer networks and/or security systems by assessing and validating the identity of an individual through the capture and recognition of the individual's electrocardiogram tracing, cardiac output and/or other physiological and cardiovascular parameters; Computer hardware, software and peripheral devices for use in electrocardiogram diagnostics and/or measurement of cardiac output and other physiological and cardiovascular parameters, assessing and validating the identity of an individual through the capture and recognition of the individual's electrocardiogram tracing, cardiac output and/or other physiological and cardiovascular parameters, and/or controlling access of an individual to electronic communications, computerized systems, electronic devices, building entry, computer networks and/or security systems by assessing and validating the identity of an individual through the capture and recognition of the individual's electrocardiogram tracing, cardiac output and/or other physiological and cardiovascular parameters; and instructional manuals relating to the foregoing products sold as a unit | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Product research and development; technical consulting services in the field of electrocardiogram diagnostics and measurement of cardiac output and other physiological and cardiovascular parameters for personal identification and measurement of biological and personal traits for identity management and authentication | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 13, 2018 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 13, 2018 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 13, 2018 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 16, 2018 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 16, 2018 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 16, 2018 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 27, 2018 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 19, 2018 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 19, 2018 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 21, 2017 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 21, 2017 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 27, 2017 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 27, 2017 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 27, 2017 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 15, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 15, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 11, 2017 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 29, 2017 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 29, 2017 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 29, 2017 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 7, 2017 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 26, 2016 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 26, 2016 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 26, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 16, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 16, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 14, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 8, 2016 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 7, 2016 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2016 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2016 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 14, 2015 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Oct 14, 2015 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 25, 2015 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 25, 2015 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 25, 2015 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 11, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 10, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 10, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 10, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 9, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 9, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 9, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 3, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 12, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 2, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |