USPTO serial 86548655
THE APPLICATION PERFORMANCE COMPANY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FERRAIUOLO, DOMINIC
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with THE APPLICATION PERFORMANCE COMPANY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David A.W. Wong
DAVID A.W. WONG BARNES & THORNBURG LLP11 S MERIDIAN STINDIANAPOLIS, IN 46204-3535UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer hardware; computer network hardware; computer peripherals; USB wireless adaptors; ethernet adaptors; computer operating software; computer software for use in the operation of computers; network management computer software systems; computer software for network analysis; computer software used to monitor, analyze, manage, assess and anticipate trends, troubleshoot, record, improve, and enhance the performance and security of computer applications, servers, network devices, data storage and communications protocols of computer networks; computer hardware and embedded software to monitor, analyze, manage, assess and anticipate trends, troubleshoot, record, improve, and enhance the performance and security of computer applications, servers, network devices, data storage and communications protocols of computer networks; computer hardware and software to monitor, manage, analyze, assess and anticipate trends, troubleshoot, and enhance the performance and security of the transmission of data and information; server and networking software used to improve the performance of computer applications, servers, data storage and communications protocols used in wide area, local area, and global networks; computer software for transmitting and sharing of global network traffic, data and information across computer networks; computer software for optimizing and managing the performance, security, and delivery of computer application traffic, computer applications, websites, and data over networks; computer software for use in the electronic transmission of computer applications and data across computer networks; computer software for computer network traffic management; computer software for providing traffic management, application acceleration, application and network security, and server optimization; computer software used to deliver, deploy and manage software applications and data over computers networks; computer software for the transfer of data over private and public networks and the global computer network; computer software for use in the electronic transmission of computer applications and data across computer networks; software for managing application availability and performance by identifying the application and infrastructure relationship in computer systems, networks, appliances, and applications; computer hardware and software enabling users to identify, monitor, diagnose, and analyze business transaction performance, including application performance, end-user experience, and holistic analysis of application component system metrics; computer network software for packet capture, performance analysis, and protocol analysis; computer software for use in visualization, modeling, and simulation of data communication networks and networked applications for use in the fields of information technology, telecommunications, software development, and software testing and program manuals sold as a unit; embedded server software, storage software, and networking software sold as an integral component of computer hardware to improve the performance of computer applications, servers, data storage and communications protocols used in wide area and global networks; computer software for use by service providers, enterprises, and systems integrators to install, monitor, manage, troubleshoot, diagnose, verify and support their real-time communications, including IP telephony and video, networks and services; computer software which extends standard internet transport protocols to maximize link utilization and reliability of data communications; computer software and software development kits (SDKs) comprising of computer software development tools, each for use in the operation of computers, transfer of data over private and public networks and the global computer network, transmitting and sharing of global network traffic, data and information across computer networks, optimizing and managing the performance, security, and delivery of computer application traffic, computer applications, websites, and data over networks, used in the electronic transmission of computer applications and data across computer networks, for computer network traffic management, for providing traffic management, application acceleration, application and network security, and server optimization, to deliver, deploy and manage software applications and data over computers networks, and facilitating application, website and data deployment, management, security and access across computer networks | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Riverbed Technology, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Riverbed Technology, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named THE APPLICATION PERFORMANCE COMPANY
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 19, 2018 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 19, 2018 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 24, 2018 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 23, 2018 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 6, 2018 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Apr 6, 2018 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 17, 2017 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 13, 2017 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 13, 2017 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Oct 13, 2017 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 15, 2017 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 13, 2017 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 13, 2017 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 13, 2017 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 20, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 19, 2016 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 13, 2016 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 13, 2016 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 14, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| May 13, 2016 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 12, 2016 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 13, 2016 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 13, 2016 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 13, 2015 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 18, 2015 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 18, 2015 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 29, 2015 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 16, 2015 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 8, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 23, 2015 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 30, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 29, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 29, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 14, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 14, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 14, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 6, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 13, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 3, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |