USPTO serial 86555365
WINDTREKKER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 5248404Status 713
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 25, 2017
- Examiner
- VANSTON, KATHY
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with WINDTREKKER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Gloucestershire, GB
Gloucestershire, GB
Gloucestershire, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
NANCY SABARRA
NANCY SABARRA FROSS ZELNICK LEHRMAN & ZISSU, P.C.151 WEST 42ND ST., 17TH FL.NEW YORK, NY 10036UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Clothing, casual clothing, sportswear and leisurewear, namely, hooded sweatshirts, printed t-shirts, t-shirts, polo shirts, short-sleeved and long-sleeved shirts, shirts, blouses, shorts, baggy shorts, long-sleeved t-shirts, rugby tops, printed and embroidered sweatshirts, cardigans, sweaters, zip tops, jogging outfits, pants and suits, trousers, jeans, fleece pullovers, dresses, skirts, tops, lined and unlined jackets, jackets, coats, wind resistant jackets, trench coats, leather jackets, jackets coated with wax, military blazers, macs in the nature of water resistant or weather resistant coats, gilets, hunting jackets, army jackets, bomber jackets, cagoules, suits, waistcoats, ties, leggings, socks, scarves, gloves, swimwear, belts, underwear, camisoles, bras, knickers, boxer shorts, underpants, slips, undergarments, nightwear, pajamas, bathrobes and dressing gowns | SECTION 18 - CANCELLED | Mar 1, 2015 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 8, 2021 | C18. | CANCELLED SECTION 18-TOTAL | — |
| Nov 8, 2021 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 5, 2021 | CANG | CANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 5, 2021 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 18, 2019 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 18, 2019 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 25, 2017 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 9, 2017 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 9, 2017 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 19, 2017 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 31, 2017 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 21, 2017 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 20, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 20, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 17, 2017 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 9, 2017 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 9, 2017 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 9, 2017 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 7, 2017 | AAUA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 6, 2017 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 4, 2017 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 4, 2017 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 3, 2017 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 2, 2017 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 2, 2017 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 9, 2017 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 9, 2017 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 9, 2017 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 6, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 6, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 17, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 2, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 2, 2016 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 5, 2016 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 5, 2016 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 5, 2016 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 5, 2016 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 5, 2016 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 5, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 15, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 14, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 14, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 8, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 12, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 12, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 12, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 11, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 11, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 11, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 11, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 19, 2015 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 18, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 16, 2015 | TAEA | TEAS AMENDMENT ENTERED BEFORE ATTORNEY ASSIGNED | — |
| Mar 16, 2015 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 10, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |