USPTO serial 86556011
IIONLY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BELENKER, ESTHER
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with IIONLY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jessica S. Parise
Jessica S. Parise Goodwin Procter LLP620 Eighth AvenueThe New York Times BuildingNew York, NY 10018Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | downloadable mobile application, encryption software applications, namely, software applications used to protect data, authenticate users, control access, prevent data loss and communicate threats, and send and deliver secure data | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable, encryption software, namely, software applications used to protect data, authenticate users, control access, prevent data loss and communicate threats, and send and deliver secure data | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SERTINTYONE CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by SERTINTYONE CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by eCharge2 Corporation
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named IIONLY
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 15, 2019 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 15, 2019 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 12, 2018 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2018 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 7, 2018 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Sep 7, 2018 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 10, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 30, 2018 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 29, 2018 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 28, 2018 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| May 22, 2018 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| May 22, 2018 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| May 22, 2018 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 22, 2018 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| May 21, 2018 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 21, 2018 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 16, 2018 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 16, 2018 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 15, 2018 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2017 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 7, 2017 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 7, 2017 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 7, 2017 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 10, 2017 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 8, 2017 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 8, 2017 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 8, 2017 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 15, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 13, 2016 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 13, 2016 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 13, 2016 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 15, 2016 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 19, 2016 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 19, 2016 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 30, 2015 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 16, 2015 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Dec 14, 2015 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 7, 2015 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 3, 2015 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 3, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 3, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 3, 2015 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2015 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2015 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 2, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 1, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 1, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 11, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 11, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 11, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 11, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 27, 2015 | TAEA | TEAS AMENDMENT ENTERED BEFORE ATTORNEY ASSIGNED | — |
| Mar 27, 2015 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 19, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 10, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |