Drawing for OPEN PAYROLL

USPTO serial 86556587

OPEN PAYROLL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
VANSTON, KATHY
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with OPEN PAYROLL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Ellen M. Bierman

ELLEN M BIERMAN LOWE GRAHAM JONES PLLC701 5TH AVENUE SUITE 4800SEATTLE, WA 98104-7009UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Computer services, namely, providing a web-based service featuring technology enabling government agencies to publish payroll data and for enabling end-users to access the published payroll data of government agenciesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 2, 2017MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
May 2, 2017ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
May 2, 2017EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jan 17, 2017EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Nov 29, 2016RBFTREPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES—
Oct 28, 2016GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Oct 28, 2016GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Oct 28, 2016CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Sep 20, 2016EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Sep 20, 2016JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Sep 12, 2016EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jul 21, 2016GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jul 21, 2016GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 21, 2016CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 30, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 29, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 29, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 11, 2016ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jan 7, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 7, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 7, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 16, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 15, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 15, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 8, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 15, 2015GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 15, 2015GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 15, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 10, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 19, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 10, 2015NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance