USPTO serial 86557169
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Carrie Johnson
CARRIE JOHNSON MacMillan, Sobanski & Todd, LLC720 Water StreetOne Maritime Plaza, Fifth FloorToledo, OH 43604-1853| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 024 | Cotton, polyester, spandex, fleece, linen, and viscose fabrics and articles of fabric material, namely, towels, table napkins, chair covers, individual place mats, pillowcases; bed and table linen and tablecloths of textiles; table covers of plastic and textiles; curtains; blankets; eiderdowns, bed blankets; face towels of textile, dishtowels, bedspreads, covers for mattresses; shower curtains | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | Garments, namely, clothing for professional use, namely, pants, shirts, jackets, suits, blazers, pullovers, blouses, skirts, vests, dresses, polo shirts, t-shirts, neckties, ties, bow ties, scarves, belts, outdoor jackets, outdoor pants, cook's jackets, cook's pants, cook's shirts, chef's hats, bandanas, stockings, socks, pantyhose, leather trousers, dirndl dresses, aprons, smock overalls, aprons, gloves and headwear, made of especially for professional use and without any connection to the fashion industry; shoes, also made especially for professional use | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Retail store services, on-line retail store services and mail order services for restaurants, catering and hotel establishments featuring bed and table linen, working clothes, namely, waiter´s and cook´s apparel | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 27, 2019 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 26, 2019 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 28, 2018 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2018 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 28, 2018 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 3, 2018 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 3, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 20, 2018 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 17, 2017 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 14, 2017 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 5, 2016 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 15, 2016 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 14, 2016 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 9, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 31, 2016 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| May 31, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 31, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 31, 2016 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 31, 2016 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 2, 2015 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 2, 2015 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 2, 2015 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 24, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 23, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 23, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 23, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 13, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 13, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 13, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 11, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 19, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 12, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |