USPTO serial 86558201
ACCEL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DAHLING, KRISTIN M
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ACCEL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Oak Bluff, Manitoba, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James T. Nikolai
JAMES T. NIKOLAI Nikolai & Mersereau P A900 2nd Ave S Ste 1550Minneapolis, MN 55402-3352UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | (Based on Intent to Use) Fertilizers for agricultural use(Based on 44(d) Priority Application) Fertilizers for agricultural use | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 7, 2016 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 7, 2016 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 26, 2016 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 26, 2016 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 26, 2016 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 5, 2016 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 5, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 19, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 10, 2015 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 10, 2015 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 10, 2015 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 10, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 20, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 12, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |