USPTO serial 86558556
V
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 30, 2017
- Examiner
- RIEPEL, CHRISTINA MAXINE
- Law office
- —
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with V?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $548*
Plus Government fees of $1,300
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joshua M. Gerben, Esq.
Joshua M. Gerben, Esq. Gerben Perrott, PLLC1050 Connecticut Ave NW, Suite 500WASHINGTON, DC 20036UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | [ Moulding machines, namely, injection moulding machines ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 009 | Metrology apparatus, namely, dimensional metrology jigs used as measuring instruments and structural fixings to be used therewith; none being for use in the fields of automotive diagnostics or for checking the authenticity of plastic or cellulosic films comprising security or anti-counterfeiting features therein, and bank notes and security documents or films made at least partly therefrom | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Metrology services, namely, dimensional metrology services; Mold-flow analysis services, namely, testing and analysis of injection moulding designs; Research services in the fields of dimensional metrology and injection moulding mold-flow analysis; none relating to the fields of checking the authenticity of plastic or cellulosic films comprising security or anti-counterfeiting features therein, and bank notes and security documents or films made at least partly therefrom or automotive diagnostics | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Verus Precision Ltd
- Other trademarks owned by Verus Precision Ltd
- Other trademarks owned by Verus Precision Ltd
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named V
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 30, 2026 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 4, 2024 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 4, 2024 | C15P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jan 4, 2024 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 11, 2023 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| May 30, 2022 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| May 30, 2017 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 14, 2017 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2017 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 22, 2017 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 7, 2017 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 26, 2017 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 26, 2017 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 26, 2017 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 26, 2017 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 26, 2017 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 25, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 25, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 19, 2017 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 19, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 19, 2017 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 19, 2017 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 9, 2017 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 9, 2017 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 13, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 13, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 13, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 21, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 21, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 19, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 9, 2016 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 21, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 14, 2015 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 14, 2015 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 14, 2015 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 12, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 12, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 12, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 17, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 17, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 17, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 15, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 21, 2015 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 13, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |