Drawing for HEALTHLIVE.NET

USPTO serial 86559142

HEALTHLIVE.NET

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
AIKENS, RONALD E
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HEALTHLIVE.NET?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

David M. Perry

DAVID M. PERRY Blank and Rome Llp1 Logan Sq Fl 8Philadelphia, PA 19103-6998UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Proximity sensors; electronic proximity switches; proximity transmitters and receivers; electronic location sensors and switches; transponder location system; location and proximity devices, namely, electronic beacons for enabling wireless telecommunications protocol connectivity to mobile devices; wireless transmitters and receiversACTIVE—
038Transmission of data and information by electronic means; communication and telecommunication services, namely, transmission of voice, data, graphics, images, audio and video by means of telecommunications networks, wireless communication networks, and the InternetACTIVE—
042Platform as a service (SAAS) services featuring computer software platforms for use in the management of location and proximity devices, transmitters, sensors, and switches; consulting services in the field of location and proximity devices, transmitters, sensors, and switches; technical support services, namely, monitoring and managing location and proximity devices, transmitters, sensors, and switchesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 12, 2016MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 12, 2016ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 13, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 11, 2016EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 11, 2016EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Feb 11, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 11, 2015NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 16, 2015NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jun 16, 2015PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 27, 2015NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
May 12, 2015PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 12, 2015ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 20, 2015CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 20, 2015XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Apr 20, 2015GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 20, 2015GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 20, 2015CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Apr 20, 2015GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 20, 2015GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 20, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 10, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 21, 2015MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
Mar 20, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 13, 2015NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance