Drawing for JUPITER

USPTO serial 86561295

JUPITER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MUNN LEWIS, LAKEISHA S
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with JUPITER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lynne M.J. Boisineau

LYNNE M.J. BOISINEAU McDermott Will & Emery Llp4 Park Plz Ste 1700Irvine, CA 92614-2559UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
012Vehicles for space flight, namely, manned and unmanned spacecraftACTIVE—
039Space flight services, namely, organizing and conducting manned and unmanned space flight services for others; transport services, namely, transportation of passengers and goods by space flightACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 11, 2017MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 11, 2017ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 9, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 7, 2017EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Feb 7, 2017EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Feb 7, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 7, 2017TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 9, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Aug 5, 2016TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 5, 2016EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Aug 5, 2016EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Aug 5, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 9, 2016NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 15, 2015NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Dec 15, 2015PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 25, 2015NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Nov 10, 2015PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 9, 2015ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 19, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 30, 2015CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 2, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 2, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 2, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 23, 2015GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Apr 23, 2015GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Apr 23, 2015CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Apr 20, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 23, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 14, 2015NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance