Drawing for IN ALL THE WORLD THERE'S ONLY ONE ZEHNDERS

USPTO serial 86562172

IN ALL THE WORLD THERE'S ONLY ONE ZEHNDERS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
JACKSON, WILLIAM D
Law office
LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with IN ALL THE WORLD THERE'S ONLY ONE ZEHNDERS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Julie A. Greenberg

Julie A. Greenberg Reising Ethington P.C.755 W Big Beaver Rd, Suite 1850Troy, MI 48084United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
043Restaurant servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 6, 2026TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 6, 2026ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 6, 2026REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jul 3, 2017MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jun 17, 2017ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jun 17, 2017EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Mar 2, 2017EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Dec 19, 2016RBFTREPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES—
Nov 21, 2016GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Nov 21, 2016GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Nov 21, 2016CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Sep 23, 2016JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jul 29, 2016GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jul 29, 2016GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jul 29, 2016CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Jul 15, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 15, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 15, 2016ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 11, 2016ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jul 11, 2016EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jul 11, 2016JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jul 11, 2016EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jan 11, 2016GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jan 11, 2016GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 11, 2016CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 19, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 18, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 18, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 18, 2015GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 18, 2015GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 18, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 16, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 25, 2015MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
Mar 24, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 16, 2015NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance