USPTO serial 86562178
ECOTIER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CROSS,TRACY L
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ECOTIER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark Tidman
MARK TIDMAN Baker & Hostetler1050 Connecticut Ave NW Ste 1100Washington, DC 20036-5318UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer data storage devices, namely, blank computer high-speed disk-based, tape-based, object, cloud, public cloud, private cloud, hybrid cloud, tiered, flash and virtualization storage devices and servers, and related software for providing data storage, archiving, deduplication, replication, backup, management, reporting, performance optimization, security and encryption, retention and disaster recovery, of electronic data, and for content workflow and management directly, indirectly, and via network connection; computer tape-based storage devices, namely, tape drives, autoloaders and tape libraries; Computer data storage hardware and software for data management and archiving, storage management, and reporting of data; software for performance optimization of data and data storage devices and systems; data security and encryption software; data retention software; content workflow and management software; computer high speed disk-based, tape-based, object, cloud, public cloud, private cloud, hybrid cloud, tiered, flash and virtualization storage devices, namely, servers; and related software for providing data storage, archiving, deduplication, replication, backup, management, reporting, performance optimization, security and encryption, retention and disaster recovery, of electronic data, and for content workflow and management directly, indirectly, and via network connection; blank magnetic tape for computer data storage; server interaction software; software for data management and archiving, storage management, and reporting of data; software for performance optimization of data and data storage devices and systems; data security and encryption software; data retention software; content workflow and management software; downloadable electronic publications in the nature of operating manuals, user guides, pamphlets and brochures about, for use with, and directed to, tape-based, high-speed disk-based computer, object, cloud, tiered and virtualization storage devices and servers, and server interaction software in the field of computer data storage devices | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | Installation, maintenance and repair of data storage devices, systems, and hardware for others; installation, maintenance and repair of data archive appliances and data deep archive appliances, devices, systems, and hardware for others; installation, maintenance and repair of computer high-speed disk-based, tape-based, object, cloud, public cloud, private cloud, hybrid cloud, tiered, flash and virtualization storage devices, systems, subsystems, and servers | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Design of data storage devices, systems, hardware, software, and solutions for others; installation, maintenance and repair of data storage software, and solutions for others; design of data archive appliances and data deep archive appliances, devices, systems, hardware, software and solutions for others; installation, maintenance and repair of data archive software and solutions for others; design, installation, maintenance and repair of cloud storage and archive software platforms for others; design, of computer high-speed disk-based, tape-based, object, cloud, public cloud, private cloud, hybrid cloud, tiered, flash and virtualization storage devices, systems, subsystems, and servers; design, installation, maintenance and repair of software for providing data storage, archiving, deduplication, replication, backup, management, reporting, performance optimization, security and encryption, retention and disaster recovery, of electronic data, and for content workflow and management directly, indirectly, and via network connection; design, installation, maintenance and repair of computer software for providing data storage, archiving, deduplication, replication, backup, management, reporting, performance optimization, security and encryption, retention and disaster recovery, of electronic data, and for content workflow and management directly, indirectly, and via network connection; installation of server interaction software, software for data management and archiving, software for storage management, software for reporting of data, software for performance optimization of data and data storage devices and systems, data security and encryption software, data retention software, content workflow and management software | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 1, 2025 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Apr 2, 2018 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 2, 2018 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 30, 2017 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| May 26, 2017 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 26, 2017 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 26, 2017 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 9, 2017 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 7, 2017 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 7, 2017 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 7, 2017 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 30, 2016 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 5, 2016 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 5, 2016 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 15, 2016 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 31, 2016 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 26, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 23, 2016 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 23, 2016 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 23, 2016 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 23, 2016 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 25, 2015 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Oct 25, 2015 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 25, 2015 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 21, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 21, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 14, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 28, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 25, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 25, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 25, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 16, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 25, 2015 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 24, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 16, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |