USPTO serial 86563236
LONDON HEAVEN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GLASSER, CARYN
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LONDON HEAVEN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Birmingham, GB
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 033 | CARBONATED ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES EXCEPT BEERS :SPIRITS, WHISKEY, SCOTCH WHISKEY, MALT WHISKEY, SINGLE MALT SCOTCH WHISKEY, RUM, WHITE RUM, DARK RUM, VODKA, GIN, SHERRY, BRANDY, PORT, WINE, SPARKLING WINES, FORTIFIED WINE, LOW-ALCOHOLIC WINE, WINE COOLER, HARD CIDER, ALCOPOPS, LIQUERS, PREPARED ALCOHOLIC COCKTAIL, ALCOHOLIC COCKTAIL MIXES, APERITIFS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 1, 2016 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Jul 19, 2016 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Jun 29, 2016 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jun 20, 2016 | TPET | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 8, 2016 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Apr 6, 2016 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Mar 23, 2016 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Mar 15, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 8, 2016 | ERRS | TEAS REQUEST FOR REINSTATEMENT | — |
| Jan 13, 2016 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 13, 2016 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 17, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 17, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 17, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 17, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 24, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 17, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |