Drawing for THIRST RESPONDER

USPTO serial 86563274

THIRST RESPONDER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SPILS, CAROL A
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THIRST RESPONDER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kevin Oliveira

KEVIN OLIVEIRA ODIN FELDMAN & PITTLEMAN PC1775 WIEHLE AVESTE 400RESTON, VA 20190-5159

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025Clothing, namely, sweat pants, sweat shorts, sweat suits, lounge pants, pants, trousers, athletic shoes, beach shoes, shoes, anklets and socks, belts, short sets, ties, neckties, wraps, jackets, denim jackets, fur jackets, leather jackets, rain jackets, wind resistant jackets, wrap-arounds, briefs, thongs and underwear, headgear, namely, hats and caps, caps with visors, knitted capsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 24, 2019MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 24, 2019ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 27, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Nov 26, 2018EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Nov 20, 2018EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Nov 20, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 26, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 24, 2018EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
May 24, 2018EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
May 24, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 23, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Nov 22, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Nov 22, 2017NOACCORRECTED NOA E-MAILED—
Nov 21, 2017EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Nov 21, 2017EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Nov 21, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 21, 2017EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Nov 21, 2017DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jun 20, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 6, 2017AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jun 6, 2017AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
May 25, 2017NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
May 24, 2017EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
May 24, 2017EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
May 24, 2017TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
May 24, 2017PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
May 24, 2017PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Oct 16, 2016EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Oct 6, 2016DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Oct 6, 2016ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Oct 6, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 24, 2016NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 29, 2016NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Mar 29, 2016PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 9, 2016NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Feb 25, 2016PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 22, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 8, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 8, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 1, 2016ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Feb 1, 2016EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Feb 1, 2016JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Feb 1, 2016EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jul 31, 2015GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jul 31, 2015GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 31, 2015CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 29, 2015DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jun 29, 2015DMCCDATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED—
Jun 29, 2015AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jun 26, 2015DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Jun 26, 2015TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 26, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 26, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 26, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 26, 2015ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Jun 8, 2015CEAPEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION MAILED—
Jun 8, 2015CPEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED—
Jun 5, 2015CEPECOMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION ENTERED—
Jun 5, 2015ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 2, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 24, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 17, 2015NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance