USPTO serial 86563431
BRIDGE INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY SERVICES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CRENNAN, KEVIN GERARD
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BRIDGE INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY SERVICES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael A. Lisi
MICHAEL A LISI BRIDGE INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY SERVICES PLLC27332 WOODWARD AVE STE 200ROYAL OAK, MI 48067-0900UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 045 | Legal services in the field of intellectual property law; intellectual property consultation | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 10, 2017 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Mar 23, 2017 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Mar 23, 2017 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 11, 2017 | EXDM | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED AS MOOT | — |
| Oct 13, 2016 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 13, 2016 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 13, 2016 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 5, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 5, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 5, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 23, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 23, 2016 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 23, 2016 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 23, 2016 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 23, 2016 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 23, 2016 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Mar 24, 2016 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Mar 24, 2016 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 24, 2016 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 3, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 3, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 25, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 18, 2016 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 18, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 18, 2016 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 18, 2016 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 13, 2016 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 13, 2016 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 17, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 17, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 17, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 17, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 24, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 17, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |