Drawing for DIGITAL LIGHTFIELD SIGNAL

USPTO serial 86563601

DIGITAL LIGHTFIELD SIGNAL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LAPTER, ALAIN J
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DIGITAL LIGHTFIELD SIGNAL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Joseph V. Myers III

JOSEPH V MYERS III SEYFARTH SHAW LLP1075 PEACHTREE STREET NE SUITE 2500ATLANTA, GA 30309UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Wearable computer hardware, namely, an optical display system incorporating a dynamic light-field display, namely, a semi-transparent array of many small curved mirrors which reflect light to create an image in 3-D space, used in connection with entertainment, education, marketing, social media, engineering, architecture, medicine and business administrationACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 2, 2018MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Oct 2, 2018ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Oct 2, 2018EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Sep 14, 2018CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Sep 14, 2018COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Jul 19, 2018EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Apr 2, 2018GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 2, 2018GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 2, 2018CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Feb 6, 2018JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Apr 12, 2017ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 12, 2017REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Apr 3, 2017GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Apr 3, 2017GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Apr 3, 2017CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Mar 27, 2017JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Mar 9, 2017EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Mar 9, 2017JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Mar 8, 2017NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Mar 8, 2017EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Mar 8, 2017PGTTPETITION GRANTED - TTAB APPEAL FILED—
Feb 27, 2017APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Feb 13, 2017EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Feb 7, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 7, 2017PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Feb 7, 2017EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Dec 7, 2016MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 7, 2016ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 11, 2016GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
May 11, 2016GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 11, 2016CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 21, 2016ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 21, 2016REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Nov 11, 2015GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 11, 2015GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 11, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 5, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 4, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 4, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 4, 2015GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 4, 2015GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 4, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 1, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 25, 2015MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
Mar 24, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 17, 2015NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance