USPTO serial 86563990
WINTER COSMETICS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RICHARDS, SUSAN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with WINTER COSMETICS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
A. Reagan Fibbe
A. REAGAN FIBBE FIBBE LIGHTNER LLP3733-1 WESTHEIMER RD., NO. 1009HOUSTON, TX 77027UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Non-medicated skin care preparations and cosmetics | ACTIVE | — |
| 005 | Medicated skin care preparations and medicated cosmetics | ACTIVE | — |
| 010 | Devices and instruments for cosmetic treatments, facial rejuvenation and toning, and skin care, namely, microdermabrasion apparatus; dermatological instruments that perform laser dermabrasion of the skin for cosmetic treatments; cosmetic apparatus using fractional radiofrequency and switching, vacuuming and cooling technologies for performing aesthetic skin treatment procedures; scar removal devices, namely, hand-held motorized micro-needling dermal devices for use in dermatology treatments to minimize scars; photon therapy apparatus and parts therefor for use in cosmetic procedures; skin and facial toning machines for cosmetic use; medical devices for treating skin conditions and providing aesthetic skin treatments; visible light treatment instruments for medical use in treating skin conditions and providing aesthetic skin treatments; and medical devices for nonsurgical cosmetic treatments for facial rejuvenation, facial skin toning, and skin care, namely, electronic, mechanical and ultrasonic skin tightening, skin conditioning and skin cleaning apparatus | ACTIVE | — |
| 044 | Beauty consultation services regarding the selection and use of skin care preparations, personal care products, and beauty treatments; providing dermatology and beauty information concerning the selection and use of skin care preparations, personal care products, beauty treatments, and personal appearance | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 27, 2017 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Jun 27, 2017 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Jun 26, 2017 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 6, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 6, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 6, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 6, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 6, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 6, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 9, 2016 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Aug 9, 2016 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Jul 26, 2016 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 22, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 12, 2016 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 12, 2016 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 12, 2016 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 12, 2016 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 6, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 6, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 6, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 22, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 22, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 22, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 25, 2015 | CEPE | COMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION ENTERED | — |
| Jun 25, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 25, 2015 | GEAN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 25, 2015 | GEAP | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 25, 2015 | CPEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 17, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 25, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 17, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |