USPTO serial 86564584
MIRACU
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4930712Status 711
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 5, 2016
- Examiner
- MORENO, PAUL A
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MIRACU?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
WAYING TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT CO., LIMITED
MONGKOK KLN, HONGKONG, HK
Other trademarks owned by WAYING TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT CO., LIMITED
WAYING TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT CO., LIMITED
MONGKOK KLN, HONGKONG, HK
Other trademarks owned by WAYING TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT CO., LIMITED
WAYING TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT CO., LIMITED
MONGKOK KLN, HONGKONG, HK
Other trademarks owned by WAYING TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT CO., LIMITED
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
NORMAN R. VAN TREECK
NORMAN R. VAN TREECK PASADENA LEGAL GROUP595 LINCOLN AVE.SUITE 200PASADENA, CA 91103Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | women's underclothing; underwear; underclothing; body linen; corselets; pyjamas; pajamas; underpants; brassieres; outerclothing, namely, jackets and coats; cyclists' clothing, namely, cyclists' jerseys; bathing suits; swimsuits; waterproof jackets and pants; non-slipping devices for footwear, namely, non-slip soles for footwear; caps; sweat-absorbent stockings; gloves; turbans | SECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED | Oct 20, 2012 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by WAYING TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT CO., LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by WAYING TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT CO., LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by WAYING TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT CO., LIMITED
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named MIRACU
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 28, 2022 | C7.. | CANCELLED SECTION 7-TOTAL | — |
| Mar 28, 2022 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 22, 2022 | CAND | CANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 15, 2021 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 5, 2021 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 5, 2016 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 19, 2016 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 19, 2016 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 30, 2015 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 14, 2015 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 7, 2015 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 4, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 4, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 4, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 4, 2015 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 4, 2015 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 11, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 11, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 11, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 1, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 1, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 24, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 9, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 30, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 30, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 30, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 19, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 26, 2015 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 25, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 19, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |