Drawing for GOOD GRAINS

USPTO serial 86565322

GOOD GRAINS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4938636Status 713
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Apr 12, 2016
Examiner
BODRI, KRISTIN MARIE
Law office
TTAB

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GOOD GRAINS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Richard M. Goldberg

RICHARD M GOLDBERG25 E SALEM ST STE 419HAKENSACK, NJ 07601UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030STEEL CUT OATS, CORN GRITS, MILLED FLAX SEEDS, FLAX MEAL FOR HUMAN CONSUMPTION, WHEAT GERM FOR HUMAN CONSUMPTION, A BLEND OF MILLED FLAX SEEDS AND PROCESSED CHIA SEEDS, PEARLED BARLEYSECTION 18 - CANCELLEDOct 10, 2010

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 8, 2016C18.CANCELLED SECTION 18-TOTAL—
Sep 8, 2016CANTCANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Sep 2, 2016CANGCANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999—
Jul 25, 2016PETCCANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Apr 12, 2016R.SRREGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTERYour mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application.
Mar 9, 2016PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 3, 2016CNTAAPPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER—
Feb 26, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 26, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 22, 2016ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 20, 2016ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Feb 12, 2016GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Feb 12, 2016GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 12, 2016CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 15, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 14, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 14, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 8, 2015GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 8, 2015GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 8, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 21, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 21, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 16, 2015ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 27, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 23, 2015GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 23, 2015GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 23, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 18, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 25, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 19, 2015NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance