Drawing for FORCE

USPTO serial 86565740

FORCE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
PARKER, JUSTINE D
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FORCE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Anna M. Vradenburgh

Anna M. Vradenburgh One LLP2815 Townsgate Road, Suite 320Westlake Village, CA 91361UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Electronic measuring device comprising springs, wires, a battery and a digital display for determining correct adjustment of a protective neck collar to be worn during contact sports, not for medical purposesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 17, 2018MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 17, 2018ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 2, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 1, 2018EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Apr 27, 2018EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Apr 27, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 28, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Oct 26, 2017EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Oct 26, 2017EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Oct 26, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 18, 2017ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 18, 2017REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Apr 11, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Apr 7, 2017EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Apr 7, 2017EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Apr 7, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 4, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 30, 2016TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 30, 2016EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Sep 30, 2016EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Sep 30, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 27, 2016CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Jul 27, 2016COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
May 7, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 6, 2016EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
May 6, 2016AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Apr 4, 2016EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Apr 4, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 10, 2015NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 15, 2015NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Sep 15, 2015PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 26, 2015NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Aug 11, 2015PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 6, 2015CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 3, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 3, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 27, 2015ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 16, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 4, 2015GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 4, 2015GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 4, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 27, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 27, 2015MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Mar 26, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 19, 2015NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance