USPTO serial 86567719
DIAGEO VENTURES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- JACKSON, WILLIAM D
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DIAGEO VENTURES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Margaret C. Lu
MARGARET C. LU DIAGEO NORTH AMERICA, INC.801 MAIN AVENUENORWALK, CT 06851-1127UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Business management services; business consultancy services; business administration; administration of business affairs; advisory services relating to business management and organization; advisory services relating to the acquisition of businesses; business advice; business assistance relating to the formation of commercial undertakings; business consulting and information services; business research and development services; marketing services; business information, advisory and consultancy services | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | Financial advisory services; venture capital services, namely, providing financing to emerging and start-up companies; venture capital financial management services; venture capital fund management; venture capital financing; project capital investment services; financial consulting services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 8, 2019 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 8, 2019 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 5, 2019 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 4, 2019 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 4, 2019 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 11, 2019 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2019 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Jan 10, 2019 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 10, 2019 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 7, 2019 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 7, 2019 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 7, 2018 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Apr 3, 2018 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 30, 2018 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 30, 2018 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Mar 30, 2018 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 7, 2017 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 5, 2017 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 5, 2017 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 5, 2017 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 3, 2017 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2017 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 1, 2017 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2017 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 7, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 5, 2016 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 5, 2016 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 5, 2016 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 7, 2016 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 12, 2016 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 12, 2016 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 23, 2016 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 8, 2016 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 6, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 4, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 4, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 26, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 22, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 16, 2016 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 4, 2016 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 4, 2016 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 4, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 18, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 17, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 17, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 24, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 24, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 24, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 22, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 31, 2015 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 27, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 21, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |