Drawing for CUTIE BUN

USPTO serial 86567845

CUTIE BUN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FICKES, JERI J
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CUTIE BUN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Stephen L. Baker

STEPHEN L. BAKER Baker and Rannells Pa92 E Main St., Suite 302Somerville, NJ 08876UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
026Hair decorating kits to create various hair styles, comprised of hair donuts, ponytail holders, hair ribbons, bobby pins, barrettes, and also including hair color chalk and tiarasACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 6, 2016MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 6, 2016ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 5, 2016TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 3, 2015NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 8, 2015NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Sep 8, 2015PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 19, 2015NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jul 31, 2015PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 27, 2015ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 15, 2015CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 15, 2015XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jul 15, 2015GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 15, 2015GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 15, 2015CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jun 29, 2015GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jun 29, 2015GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jun 29, 2015CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jun 22, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 27, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 21, 2015NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance